• Cha-ching: Could property taxes go down? Could they at least not go up?

• More glamour and opportunity as one big city. Combined, L-A might outnumber Portland in the next decade.

• More efficient government operations and, eventually, fewer employees. (Savings.)

• Your Lewiston house is on fire. Auburn’s trucks are closer, they respond first. Yeah! That few minutes shaved off response time might save your house – or your life.

• Potential kudos for bucking a trend – more communities in Maine split up than get together. Who doesn’t want to be a glowing, progressive poster child?

• Bigger population might mean better bond/credit rating. Dry stuff, but it saves money.

Advertisement

Working in its favor

• Impending vacancies in Auburn (superintendent, city manager) may nudge talks along more quickly than one might expect.

• Hello, John Jenkins. Former Lewiston mayor, current Auburn mayor.

• Dover-Foxcroft didn’t agree to a merge until women got the right to vote and decided enough already. The Twin Cities have slightly more women then men, according to the U.S. Census.

• The Twin Cities have gotten the most state money of any community to study the issue, and they’ve floated the most ambitious plan. People are watching and rooting.

• You don’t even need Legislative approval to merge. Plus, each community keeps its own old debt, according to statute. That’s one contentious issue off the table.

Advertisement

• There’s no discounting history: 150 years of working together. (See timeline.)

• In 1996 and 2006, separate polls found most residents favored more cooperation.

Disadvantages

• Savings? Don’t expect them right away.

• And on that note: it’ll likely cost more in the short-term. One city’s got to raise its employees’ salaries to match the other. There might be new network/software/equipment to purchase to make L and A more compatible.

• City-city consolidation doesn’t happen that often in the U.S. Is that a cautionary tale?

Advertisement

Potential Snags

• Fear of the unknown. Face it, change is scary.

• Got endurance? It’s not uncommon for consolidation efforts to take three, four or five tries to work.

• Various unions have got to agree – no guarantee of harmony there.

• Concerns about loss of identity.

• No layoffs? OK, so how do two police chiefs, fire chiefs, etc. work together?

Advertisement

• Auburn is two-thirds the size of Lewiston. Smaller cities have a track record of developing a “the big guy wants me to pay his bills and bail him out” complex.

• Who cares? People are most motivated to change the status quo by a shake-up (someone’s hand caught in cookie jar, scandal, deadly fire.) We haven’t had that.

• Could failed discussions rub Lewiston or Auburn the wrong way? If things don’t work out, one side might pack up their things and go home.

• It’s got to feel win-win for both, on equal terms, and how likely is that, down to the dollar?

• People feel vested in their job or elected position – why would they suggest eliminating themselves?

Based on interviews with a more than 20 city managers, government analysts and people involved in consolidation talks across the country.


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.