The following editorial appeared in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on Thursday, April 9:

In his farewell address as president, Dwight Eisenhower, coined the phrase “military-industrial complex” to describe the “conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry … new in the American experience.”

He warned, “The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government . … Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.”

This week, another Kansas Republican, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, took dead aim at Ike’s nemesis by proposing to shift Pentagon spending priorities away from big-ticket weapons systems. He and President Obama want to spend far less on strategic weapons and more on military manpower and tactical weapons used in counter-insurgency warfare.

Overall military spending — $664 billion next year, including the cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — would increase by 4 percent, but priorities would change. This revolution has been talked about for a long time, but the military-industrial complex and its allies in Congress have always beaten it back.

To be sure, they may beat it back this time, but odds are Gates and Obama will get most of what they asked for. With the federal budget already in record deficit, there’s no way to pay for exotic weapons and increased manpower and readiness, too.

Gates and Obama are right in their priorities.

This is a signal moment in the long battle to fix military procurement policies. Pentagon weapons systems are, collectively, nearly $300 billion over budget. Accountability is negligible. The system requires sound military and budgetary assessments and continual oversight.

What Gates did this week, at long last, is a move in the right direction.

The military-industrial complex will fight these and other cuts with every weapon in its arsenal — lobbying campaigns, ad campaigns and political contributions. Too much is at stake to fall for facile arguments.

What Eisenhower said in 1961 still is true today: “Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or to participate in the conversation. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.