Am I the only one who sees something wrong with the April 29 front-page article about a person accused of cheating welfare? I read a few paragraphs and I am enraged. The paragraph starts with, “Her court-appointed attorney … “
Someone has been accused of defrauding the state out of $10,000 and, adding insult to injury, the public has to pay for her lawyer.
Those are the kinds of things people need to focus on, not wasting time and money over a removed mural.
Peter Neal, Minot
Copy the Story LinkSend questions/comments to the editors.
Related Stories
Latest Articles
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Hi, to comment on stories you must . This profile is in addition to your subscription and website login.
Already have a commenting profile? .
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.