AUGUSTA — Dale McCormick, director of the Maine State Housing Authority, called an emergency meeting late last week with stakeholders of Elm Terrace, a 35-unit affordable housing project in Portland.

McCormick had bad news for those assembled at the University of Southern Maine’s Glickman Library. Elm Terrace, she said, was too expensive. 

In late September, developer Community Housing of Maine had submitted a final price tag of $10.9 million, up from the $8.5 million it had previously cited.

The 29 percent increase, McCormick told stakeholders, was unacceptable. She reiterated a mandate her office had given the developer last month: Cut $1 million, or risk losing nearly $800,000 in tax credits.

The directive may have seemed like a responsible request from the woman administering the millions in state and federal dollars MaineHousing funnels to developers for affordable housing projects. But it comes with real risks for Community Housing, which is heavily invested in the project.

In addition, new powers in Augusta are questioning whether McCormick is motivated by fiscal prudence or self-preservation.

Advertisement

The director’s critics wonder how many other Elm Terraces McCormick has green-lighted prior to the Republican takeover and an increased focus on cost containment.

“Why, on a regular basis, when these developers come back and ask for cost adjustments, do we say yes?” said State Treasurer Bruce Poliquin, a MaineHousing board member who has been questioning the costs of Maine’s affordable housing projects.

Such questions may not be devoid of motive. After all, McCormick is on the wrong side of the aisle. The former Democratic legislator was reappointed by Gov. John Baldacci early in 2010. 

Gov. Paul LePage has not hesitated to show his predecessor’s appointees the door. But his power to expel McCormick, who is the fiduciary of a bank-like agency with $1.6 billion in outstanding bonds, is statutorily limited.

To be removed, she must commit fraud or steal. Or demonstrate fiscal malfeasance.

Poliquin, a Republican who has proven fiercely loyal to LePage, insists that raising alarms about Elm Terrace is not politically motivated.

Advertisement

“My only agenda is being a good steward of taxpayer money,” he said.

Nonetheless, there’s little doubt that McCormick is facing increased scrutiny. The Elm Terrace issue arrived shortly after an investigation was initiated by Republicans on the Legislature’s Government Oversight Committee.

GOP panelists have been offered vague reasons for the review, which will begin sometime next year. Democrats called the probe a political witch hunt.

McCormick has said, essentially, “Bring it on.” Her office is routinely audited.

She also rejected claims that cost containment has taken a back seat to what some critics privately say is a penchant for advancing a social agenda at MaineHousing.

Not all such critics are politicians. Members of the development community have grumbled that doing business with MaineHousing is sometimes not worth the trouble. The thin profit margins are made thinner by requirements to install solar hot-water heaters or to provide health benefits to workers that in some cases exceed mandates from other state agencies.

Advertisement

None of the developers contacted by the Sun Journal were willing to air complaints on the record. Some cited fear of retribution.

Unit costs

At $10.9 million, Elm Terrace’s 35 one- and two-bedroom apartments would cost about $314,000 per unit.

Poliquin, and newly appointed MaineHousing board members, think that price is outrageous.

“Why in the world would we ask the taxpayers to pay $314,000 for 1,100-square-foot apartments?” he said, noting that the average price for a 2,000-square-foot, single-family home in Maine is about $159,000.

McCormick acknowledged that Elm Terrace has the most expensive unit cost of any MaineHousing project.

Advertisement

“A 29 percent increase in costs is huge. It’s unacceptable,” she said.

McCormick said Elm Terrace is an outlier. Poliquin isn’t convinced. He said he has discovered other projects with similarly high unit costs, including Gilman Place in Waterville, which came in at $292,000 per unit.

The $10 million project was supported by LePage when he was mayor of the city. Earlier this year, the governor attended the project’s opening.

Peter Anastos, a recently appointed board member for MaineHousing, agrees with Poliquin. Anastos, a hotel developer, said his experience in affordable housing makes him feel as if he’s in the “luxury apartment business.”

McCormick agrees that costs should come down. However, she said, comparing unit prices for subsidized housing and the private market is misleading.

Projects like Gilman Place and Elm Terrace fall under the historic tax credit program. It contains state and federal requirements that make the projects more expensive than building single-family homes.

Advertisement

For example, under state and federal mandates, downtown, infill (filling in available space) and renovation projects score higher than new construction.

McCormick said infill projects make sense for affordable housing occupants that may have limited access to vehicles. Also, expensive weatherization or energy-efficiency requirements could save taxpayers in the long run, particularly if the occupants qualify for the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program.

MaineHousing has received mixed reviews on implementing renewable-energy standards. Last year, the Maine Center for Public Interest Reporting found several problems with poorly or improperly installed solar panels and hot water heaters on MaineHousing projects.

The green energy requirement might go by the wayside. The governor is the final arbiter of MaineHousing’s development screening requirements.

LePage earlier this year ordered changes to Maine’s plan. Just as the old plan reflected Baldacci’s policy initiatives, the new one will reflect LePage’s.

That works for Bill Shanahan, president of the Northern New England Housing Investment Fund, a nonprofit agency that invests in affordable housing projects.

Advertisement

Shanahan said policy changes could help bring in costs. However, he said, affordable housing projects will still be expensive; federal mandates for rehab and infill projects will remain.

It’s a national issue, Shanahan said.

Elm Terrace

Community Housing of Maine, the developer of Elm Terrace, claims the $2.4 million spike in costs was in part driven by unforeseen environmental remediation costs.

Shanahan, who is not investing in the project, said that’s fairly typical for a rehabilitation job.

Nonetheless, MaineHousing is standing by its mandate to drive down the project’s costs. Anastos said asbestos and other issues should have been discovered during due diligence.

Advertisement

He said Community Housing appeared to be operating under the assumption that MaineHousing would simply absorb the overrun.

An Oct. 6 letter sent by Community Housing of Maine President Joanne Campbell to MaineHousing fed Anastos’ concerns. Campbell wrote that “changing the rules retrospectively” is unfair.

Community Housing has a lot to lose. The nonprofit has invested 18 months and more than $600,000 in the project.

McCormick believes Community Housing can reduce the cost of the project, but she acknowledged that doing so would require new hearings with the city of Portland, which is subsidizing a portion of the deal, and renegotiations with the University of Southern Maine, which owns the property.

According to Anastos, who attended last week’s emergency meeting, both moves appear unlikely.

According to Campbell’s letter, they’re impossible.

Advertisement

“Delaying or denying approval at this stage of development would cripple the project and put (Community Housing of Maine) at significant risk,” she wrote.

Asked whether lowering the costs is an attainable goal, McCormick said, “I would say yes. They would say no. “

She added, “I am sympathetic to their position and I think they understand mine.”

McCormick sidestepped questions about whether that view was influenced by new political considerations, or rumors that she’s in the LePage administration’s cross hairs.

LePage’s four newly appointed MaineHousing board members have increased the pressure. Anastos said he’d prefer the Elm Terrace deal not move forward at the current price unless there’s a “legal and moral obligation” to the developer.

Poliquin, meanwhile, continues to beat the drum about the cost of affordable housing. On Wednesday he expressed concerns about Elm Terrace on a WVOM radio show.

Advertisement

“As a board member of the Maine State Housing Authority, I expect our executive director (McCormick) to give us the full story on how these projects are built,” he told the Sun Journal. “I expect our executive director to take responsibility for the decisions that have been made to get us into this situation.”

Shanahan worries that political dynamic could spell trouble for Elm Terrace and Community Housing.

“It’s the wrong place at the wrong time for Elm Terrace,” he said.

smistler@sunjournal.com


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.