I am not a hunter, but I know many who hunt. All types of hunting include some sort of lure, such as using scent for deer during the rut season or rattling antlers; also, turkey/duck calls and decoys.

With baiting, hunters still leave the woods empty-handed. It is not an easy kill, as the “yes” camp will have people believe.

When people enjoy steak or hamburger — that animal was raised captive, fed grain then slaughtered before it got to the public. Is that any better than feeding bears at a site and taking a nice clean shot? At least I know the bear had a better life than non-game animals. And aren’t lobsters baited?

Maine has the lowest bear nuisance rates, which debunks the theory that baiting causes nuisance bears. If that were true, there would be a real problem. Other states that abolished their bear hunting practices have problems with nuisance bears.

If the “yes” camp thinks Maine should go back to old hunting traditions, allow a 12-month bear hunt, like it used to be in the old days when there was no IF&W to regulate hunting seasons according to wildlife population.

I believe the goal of the “yes” camp is to abolish hunting, and don’t think they aren’t trying.

The state’s biologists and IF&W are successful with conservation and people need to let them do their job.

I shall vote “no” on Question 1; it is the responsible thing to do.

Valerie Ouellette, Lisbon Falls

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.

filed under: