In November, 2016, 383,428 Mainers voted “yes” on Question 2 — a new law requiring the state to pay 55 percent of public education by adding a 3 percent surcharge on taxable incomes above $200,000 (the 3 percent does not apply to the first $200,000).
Gov. Paul LePage believes that those 383,428 people did not understand (we were too stupid to understand), so he will not follow the new law.
I attended a taxation hearing in Augusta where the idea was echoed by the business community and some proposed changes by legislators. The Legislature is talking about a tax cut for the wealthiest Mainers.
The state needs to pay the 55 percent bill it owes to public education. Since the 55 percent figure was passed in 2004, the state has never paid that amount, but shifted education costs back to towns and cities. That cost shifting results in towns cutting services and programs or raising property taxes. Hardworking Mainers are made to pay more in property taxes because the state has reneged on its responsibility.
I wonder if there will be a new commission in Augusta — a “voter understanding commission” — where referendums and initiatives will go after the election to prove the people understood their vote before the results will be accepted by the governor and Legislature.
So much for “we, the people of Maine,” or “one man, one vote,” “democracy,” and “the people have spoken.” So much for election results if it is decided that the people were not smart enough and their vote disregarded.
Pay the 55 percent.
Crystal Ward, Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less