Regarding the recent story “Rumford Water District is in ‘sound financial position'” (May 25), Rumford’s water is a precious resource that should be managed for the benefit of its residents, not handed over at a discount to a multinational corporate bottler like Nestle. Cities and towns around the country are dealing with the problems that arise when big water starts pumping in their communities — from truck traffic to depleted aquifers to problems with connected surface waters.
Rumford shouldn’t rely on Nestle’s promises. It’s time to say no to Nestle and to protect water as a public resource for all.
Nisha Swinton, Portland
Editor’s note: Swinton is the senior organizer for Food & Water Watch.
Success. Please wait for the page to reload. If the page does not reload within 5 seconds, please refresh the page.
Enter your email and password to access comments.
Invalid username/password.
Please check your email to confirm and complete your registration.
Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.
Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.
-
Lewiston-Auburn
Lewiston-Auburn Area Response Fund administrators to gather input at Wednesday meeting
-
Lewiston-Auburn
Auburn council passes watershed ordinance changes
-
Encore
Holiday handbell concert set for Dec. 13 in Augusta
-
Livermore Falls Advertiser
Farmington sets cost of living adjustment at 3%
-
Sponsored
For sale: Hospitality potential at historic residence in Maine’s Lakes Region