Remember the grand promises of Proficiency Based Learning, the new grading system of 4,3,2,1, the statements that students will earn a grade of at least 3 (proficient) in order to meet the standards and pass a course?
Remember the millions spend on training, materials, literacy and math specialists, teacher coaches, workshops, new computer programs, ever-growing school budgets, Star Academy, tutoring during and after school, during vacations and summer school to make sure students did earn grades of 3 to meet this state mandate?
At the last Lewiston School Committee meeting they had the first reading of a new grading system for the coming year. Grades K-9 will stay on the 4,3,2,1 system, requiring 3’s to pass. But, grades 7 and 8 will only require 3’s in 70 percent of the content standards and allow 2’s (not yet proficient) in 30 percent of the standards.
In grade 9 students must earn 3’s in 85 percent of the standards in core courses and allow 2’s in 15 percent of the standards. In grades 10-12 and all electives at LHS, the old grading system of 0-100 —with 70 and above passing —will be used.
No more PBL, we now have APBL: Almost Proficiency Based Learning.
Parents, students and taxpayers have been sold a pie in the sky education theory that is failing in many ways. An expensive new computer grading program called Empower based on PBL should not be implemented.
The final vote on this new grading system will be at the August school committee meeting.
Crystal Ward, Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less