“It takes a school to bankrupt a town” — gee, I loved that rather crudely written sign along Route 2 as the second vote came due on RSU 9’s million and a-half dollar increase.
I believe that conscientious citizens are doing a great service to the town of Farmington and to the school districts across the state. I believe that if district voters say “no” again to these million and a-half dollar increases, the tide would turn in our schools.
I do not believe that the RSU 9 School Board is caring for the citizens as a whole and I am very concerned about the weighted vote procedure in RSU 9, whereby the members from Farmington and Wilton hold 65 percent of the total vote. No matter how the little towns vote, they can’t win. The big spenders (Farmington and Wilton) have a stranglehold on School Board decisions.
The other really undemocratic issue is that no matter the circumstance, the school department employees get their increases.
How about taxpayers who get no increases?
The special education program involves a one-to-one ratio, yet the districts cannot afford the specialists that the department demands. The whole issue of special education needs much closer scrutiny.
I wish there would be another resounding “no” vote come September. Most people cannot afford administrative salaries of $100,000-plus.
Farmington is a rural district without real industry.
Elaine Graham, Farmington
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less