It takes courage to move beyond the emotion associated with maintaining the status quo. Some individuals will always default to the past because it worked for generations, and maybe it did, but was it the best model? They are leaving no stone unturned to develop emotional arguments focused on using “labels” to preserve a failing model.
Others are looking forward with vision for future generations, recognizing that there are startling changes in L-A’s demographics, including work force availability and demand for services, the result of which makes it even more important to consolidate each city’s efforts.
There are always risks associated with change, but I believe that there are bigger risks resulting from the failure to embrace a future directed at growth.
Some individuals will always argue about the “data,” yet previous commission’s efforts, as well as the Charter Commission’s analysis, have consistently demonstrated real savings.
This is the first time that we, as voters, have the opportunity to be heard from directly in deciding our future.
Many of the current and past elected leaders have demonstrated their support of the status quo and have worked diligently to reduce opportunities for cooperation and savings. However, some leaders have been courageous in trying to advance cooperation, but their voices were silenced by the parochial majority.
I, for one, am going to have my voice be heard and vote “yes” for One LA in November, and I encourage others to do the same.
Fred Frohardt, Auburn
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less