To the Editor:
Central Maine Power’s (CMP) electricity corridor is a bad deal for Maine for many reasons, and I believe that is why CMP, which has been ranked as the worst-run U.S. company for customer satisfaction (https://www.mainebiz.biz/
CMP’s latest line of deception is about “retroactive laws.” Voting YES on Question-1 on the upcoming ballot stops the CMP power corridor from going forward, and its retroactivity provisions are focused squarely on this issue and not some broad attempt to prevent any other kind of project or to hurt Maine’s economy. It merely reinforces existing law and requires these kinds of high-impact power projects to be approved by the legislature as the law intends.
CMP’s power corridor can’t win on the merits. As affirmed by the Natural Resources Council of Maine, the CMP corridor clearcuts pristine forest land, negatively impacts deer and brook trout habitats as well as wetlands, creates very few permanent jobs, and does not address climate change. And all this just to bring power from Quebec to Massachusetts so that CMP and Hydro Quebec can make a whole lot of money at our expense. (https://www.nrcm.org/
Maine should not be used as an extension cord for Massachusetts.
Please vote YES on Question-1 to reject the CMP power corridor and to show that Mainers can not be deceived by CMP’s dishonest big-money ads.
James Bilancia
Brewer
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less