To the Editor:
Jane Moosbruker’s Letter to the Editor regarding the elimination of Frog Jumping contests was timely and critically important for us, the children of the future, and the fate of amphibians.
Why? Frogs and toads breathe through gills as tadpoles and as adults, they develop lungs. They are our ‘canaries in the coal mine’ demonstrating by their increasing absence how polluted our waters, air, and earth have become. Dangerous for amphibians, and by extension, for every human being on the earth. The only difference between the two is that it takes longer to kill a human.
I have lived in these parts for almost forty years and have raised both frogs and toads every single spring including this one. I began this practice after I first learned in the early 80s from an academic text that frogs and toads in Maine were disappearing rapidly. “Amphibians are the most endangered species on earth”, the book stated. Reminiscent of biologist Rachel Carson’s dire warnings in Silent Spring, published sixty years ago.
For the very first time this spring, the frog eggs I raised did not hatch. Neither did those of the American toad. The message was obvious, chilling, and inescapable. Amphibians are facing extinction.
Under the circumstances, it is irresponsible to continue to have frog jumping contests as part of any festival, even if there were enough frogs to torment.
What we do to nature we do to ourselves.
Humans are the one species that believes they can continue to do whatever they choose to do without taking the consequences. As our planet heats up and crisis becomes personal, we are beginning to learn that nature will retaliate in ways we once could never have imagined.
Sara Wright Ph.D.
Woodstock
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less