I have finally gotten around to studying the issue of a merger between Lewiston and Auburn. Having read the recent consultant report, I find myself completely opposed to the idea of a merger.
I do not see where there will be any meaningful cost savings by a merger of the two cities. The consultants do not propose any meaningful cuts in the number of police officers, firefighters, teachers or public works employees working for the two cities. Those public employee positions make up the great majority of the cost of the two cities’ budgets. In fact, it would cost more to pay those employees when new union contracts would be negotiated.
The proposal to merge Lewiston and Auburn seems like a lot of smoke and mirrors. I question the motivation behind the plan, as I have never heard of any “average person” who has really been screaming out that a merger would be a good idea.
Lewiston and Auburn are two great cities with two great, but separate and distinct, histories. City officials should continue to be friends and work with each other while preserving the two cities’ unique and wonderful identities for many more years to come.
I hope other residents of Lewiston and Auburn will join me in voting against a merger when the issue comes up for a vote in November.
Kim Millette, Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less