Recently, an area television station interviewed a Lewiston attorney who criticized the red-light camera system. His words left me saddened, dismayed and reliving a very painful experience.

I had spoken in favor of the red-light camera system at a meeting, attended by our police department and the Department of Transportation, when the system was explained.

In 1994, my husband was struck while in his vehicle at the intersection of East Avenue and Russell Street by a young driver who went through a red light. The young man expressed remorse and accepted responsibility for his actions. Now he lives with what he did. His acceptance of responsibility enabled us to forgive him.

My husband’s brain injury cost society thousands of dollars for his care and rehabilitation. He became a different person, one neither of us recognized. Friends and other family members were also affected by what happened to him.

Statistics show that about 500 crashes a day are caused by drivers running red lights, and that 900 people involved died last year. I have had people tell me that they are more cautious at red lights, knowing a camera might be there.

I applaud our city for using the red-light camera system. If even one family can be spared our pain, it will be worth it. Now it is time for financial penalties to help pay for the system.

Jeanne Raymond, Lewiston


Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.