PERU – The Zoning Board of Appeals met on Thursday night to review an appeal made by Paul Bickford on fines imposed on him by the Planning Board. The fines, approximately $16,800, were questioned by Bickford’s attorney, David Austin of Rumford.
Bickford requested a waiver from the fines imposed for alleged shoreland zoning violations. But board member Jim Pulsifer said, “I feel the application is incomplete because Mr. Bickford does not state what he is appealing and the reason why.”
Austin countered that the town should have supplied an application form that asked the proper questions. He also said his client seeks verification of who in the town of Peru may issue fines. He contends that only the courts can impose fines.
This statement brought rebuttal from Code Enforcement Officer Mike Boyd, who said he had the authority to impose fines as approved by the Board of Selectmen.
Bickford implied that he was not aware of any board meetings where the fines were discussed and therefore had not been properly notified.
He said he received the permit in 2002 to start building. He was not cited in 2003 and 2004 for violations by the code enforcement officer. There was disagreement between the code enforcement officer and Bickford over whether Bickford had changed the setback or elevation of the building, or had changed the dwelling from a summer to a year-round residence.
Austin said that it is unlawful for the Planning Board to impose fines, and besides it was done behind his client’s back.
But the code enforcement officer said that the setback required by shoreland zoning was violated.
Austin said he was pleased with the proceedings of the night and he was pleased that the board was seeking legal advice.
The question of who may impose fines caused the meeting to be adjourned until the Board of Appeals can seek legal counsel.
Comments are no longer available on this story