Plaintiffs suing the LePage administration for removing the 36-foot mural from the Department of Labor planned on Friday to submit written arguments to a federal judge in hopes of bringing the case to trial.

The Attorney General’s Office, representing the administration, last month filed for a summary judgment, which would allow U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock to rule on the case without a trial.

Attorneys for the six plaintiffs, which include three artists, an attorney and two other individuals, are hoping to avoid that outcome. Plaintiffs had until midnight Friday to convince Woodcock that they have a strong-enough case to go to trial.

Jonathan Beal, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, said Friday that he expected Woodcock will rule on the summary judgment in about two weeks.

The suit centers on First Amendment arguments and whether LePage’s order to remove the 11-panel mural constituted “government speech.”

Attorneys for the plaintiffs say the administration is violating their First Amendment rights by denying them access to the mural.

Jeff Young, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys, argues that the First Amendment protects the listeners and viewers of the mural the same way it protects the creator or the artist.

The plaintiff attorneys have also raised questions about how the removal order transpired. In June the group released a strongly-worded news release blasting the governor for removing the mural without having seen it and that the idea originated from staffer John Butera, details reported in March, but lost amid the national furor.

The attorneys also questioned the source of the anonymous letter that the administration claimed had played into its decision. In the news release, attorney Jonathan Beal questioned whether the letter, which compared the artwork to the murals used in North Korea to “brainwash” the masses, had been generated by the administration to justify the removal and blunt the public fallout.

“I have serious questions about whether this was an actual complaint from a member of the public, as opposed to just something the Governor’s Office cooked up,” Beal wrote in June.

Earlier this month attorney Jeffrey Young agreed that the letter was suspicious, but declined to elaborate. Young also declined to say whether or not Butera was suspected of writing the letter given that the removal order was originally his idea.

Attorneys chose not to depose Butera for the suit. However, plaintiff attorneys this week attempted to acquire copies of the Department of Labor sign-in sheets that showed Butera visited the DOL on Feb. 28, the same day the anonymous letter was received by the Governor’s Office.

The Sun Journal obtained the sign-in sheets showing Butera visited DOL on Feb. 28 and periodically thereafter. The February visit appears to be Butera’s first trip to DOL as a member of the LePage administration. A Feb. 25 email from former acting director John Dorrer to his staff advised workers of Butera’s Feb. 28 “tour” of the offices.

A subsequent email advised DOL workers to keep their “work areas neat.”

The administration has denied authoring the letter and repeatedly declined to reveal its origin.

The mural was hung in 2008 and features scenes from Maine’s labor history, including women shipbuilders from World War II, the 1986 paper workers strike in Jay, child laborers and President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s former federal Department of Labor Secretary Frances Perkins, a part-time Maine resident who is buried in Newcastle.

According to court documents, the administration is storing the mural in a climate-controlled, undisclosed location.

The suit was filed April 1 in an attempt to compel LePage to return the mural to the Maine Department of Labor.

U.S. District Court Judge John Woodcock in April denied a request for an order to have the governor immediately return the mural.

smistler@sunjournal.com

Copy the Story Link