I am writing in response to an article analyzing the value of developing offshore wind power along the Atlantic coast (Sept. 13).

In addition to the economic value of that untapped resource in the Gulf of Maine, I believe that the project should be developed for its long term environmental value.

Society needs to transition from its use of imported fossil fuels to cleaner sources, and this change must happen soon. Approximately three-quarters of the state of Maine’s energy comes from coal, oil and natural gas.

Between climate change, air pollution, acid rain, oil spills and habitat destruction, the environment has been undeniably damaged. The public has a responsibility to protect it, and it seems only logical to reduce the dependency on fossil fuels in favor of clean and sustainable sources close to home.

By placing turbines on the open ocean, there are no trees to cut down, bats won’t fly into the blades, and sea bird populations are much less dense than on shore.

Wind power development on land has faced resistance for aesthetic reasons. That “not in my backyard” argument is understandable, and the proposed turbines would not be visible at 10-50 miles away from land.

Researchers have been collecting data to assess wildlife activity — namely whale and bird migratory routes — to determine the best possible places to build.

Hopefully, by proceeding with some careful planning, officials will find a way to meet energy demands with as little harm to the environment as possible.

Megan Howes, Auburn