I have been meaning to write this letter since December, when I read an article in the Washington Post that detailed some interesting figures about Pentagon spending. Now, I read that the White House is proposing major cuts to important domestic programs in order to fund a $54 billion increase to the already bloated Defense Department budget.
I protest.
According to that Washington Post article, the Pentagon has some 1,040,000 civilians, contractors and uniformed personnel supporting 1,300,000 troops. Core business operations, costing $134 billion, comprise 23 percent of the $580 billion overall budget. According to an internal Pentagon report made (and buried) last year, $25 billion per year in administrative waste could be eliminated without hurting our national security. Examples: There are 199,661 Army contractors (individual persons) — each paid an average of $189,188 per year; there are 197,093 such persons in the Navy paid an average of $170,865 each; and there are 122,470 Air Force contractors paid an average of $186,142.
How about stopping that stupid, overpriced privatization; bring it back “in-house” and pay substantially less for the same services? And why not close some of the 600+ military bases overseas while we are at it?
Dwight Eisenhower warned about the dangers of the military-industrial complex, but the public hasn’t heeded those warnings. One could argue that the more that is spent (beyond a reasonable level), the less safe we are. A budget of $634 billion a year is not a reasonable amount. The U.S. spends nine times what Russia spends a year and three times what China spends a year.
Enough already.
Richard Whiting, Auburn
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less