I am dumbfounded that the professional oversight system for dentists is so riddled with rules and loopholes that it allows someone like Jan Kippax to practice. I have had a run-in with Kippax, much like those already documented in the Sun Journal, with the addition of what I saw as raw blackmail thrown in.
There is absolutely no excuse for an oversight system so lax that it is essentially pointless. What kind of rules allow Kippax to keep practicing? The layers of bureaucratic rules in place shield inept and dangerous health care practitioners from public accountability. It is a classic example of why wide open access to any government regulatory system is needed. As it is, most professional oversight boards hide behind the “personnel” issue exception — a loophole so big an aircraft carrier could move through it.
Many of Kippax’s actions seem criminal to me, yet he keeps butchering people with the state’s blessing. How can this be? Where is the attorney general’s office?
And where is the local dental community? They should be up in arms about this beast sullying their own good reputations. The fact that they have let that man be part of their profession, despite multiple prior sanctions, is shameful. It will make many of their patients wonder about their own ethical standards.
Denying knowledge about Kippax’s butchery is disingenuous. His reputation follows him like a stench follows a skunk.
The whole episode is shameful.
Andrew Hall, Lewiston
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less