In response to the letter from Mark Belanger (June 1), who wrote about my remarks about him (May 27), I stand corrected (sort of ).

While campaigning, he and Steve Dyment stopped at my home to talk about the selectman election. I asked about how they felt about selling water and Belanger talked around the issue. I had let them know right off that I was for the Water District selling water.

I asked how would Rumford get the funds to replace the town’s water pipes, and that is when Belanger said we would have to raise taxes. If I had known, at that time, that the Rumford Water District doesn’t use town of Rumford’s taxes at all, I would have corrected him. Not knowing that at the time, I was surprised by his answer.

The Friday after the Water District held its meeting at the Rumford Town Auditorium, I called the Water District to ask a couple questions. That is when I found out the district doesn’t use Rumford town taxes at all.

The following Wednesday, the Rumford Falls Times carried Belanger’s rightful rebuttal to my letter. I called him to apologize and clear up what had happened.

After talking with him, I now know he meant to say raise the Water District rates, not taxes. That he has been an opponent to raising taxes is true and I applaud that. I would not have repeated what I heard him say had I known what he meant.

Ed Bulger, Rumford

Only subscribers are eligible to post comments. Please subscribe or login first for digital access. Here’s why.

Use the form below to reset your password. When you've submitted your account email, we will send an email with a reset code.