
LIVERMORE — Administrative Assistant Aaron Miller told selectpersons Jan. 5 of a proposed solar project on land leased along Route 4 and Gibbs Mill Road.
Solar Provider Group, based out of Toronto, Canada, wants to install 11,000 solar panels, Miller said.
“The company has been advised to submit a site plan review, send notification to abutters,” he said. “The Planning Board will take it up at their Jan. 21 meeting.”
Livermore passed a Limited Commercial Zoning Ordinance in 2017 that allows development along route 4, Miller noted.
When looking at the project map, it doesn’t really border Route 4, Selectperson Scott Richmond said.
The parcel being leased is off Route 4, the entire parcel is what we’re looking at, Selectperson Brett Deyling said.
“There’s going to be some questions here,” Miller said. “The outside line is the property line, the solar array is inside that. Have him apply, then we’ll knock it around.”
The name of the project, Long Pond Solar, was noted.
It is not located near Long Pond, Deyling said.
Miller referred to the section of the Limited Commercial Zoning Ordinance referencing the 250-foot requirement and what that meant. He said this project extends beyond 250 feet from Route 4.
“Do you need a variance if outside that area,” he asked.
Deyling said the area is pretty rural and there shouldn’t be any issues.
Miller noted the access way for the project is off Gibbs Mill road and asked if it should be off Route 4.
Selectperson Scott Richmond voiced concern abut what happens to the panels when the lease expires.
“That’s a concern,” Deyling said. “You can’t just throw those panels out.”
He noted the solar development would make the property more valuable, assessed more than as forest land.
If Livermore is seen as friendly for solar, it may boost the town’s tax base, Deyling said.
Supporting Sponsor for Franklin Journal, Livermore Falls Advertiser, Rangeley Highlander and Rumford Falls Times.
Keeping communities informed by supporting local news. franklinsavings.bank
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less