I hardly know where to begin in discussing the Feb. 4 article about the Androscoggin County Commission’s decision regarding the mask mandate.

While I agree that there’s much to debate regarding the constitutional authority issues, such discussions are not advanced by spectators shouting “cowards” and “shame.” Those folks should examine their free speech to determine if it does anything more than divide themselves from other community members with other beliefs. How can anything productive come from application of such rhetoric? It’s just useless venting of emotion.

Civil discourse will get us to a solution to our problems much more effectively. Just consider: those with opposing views are indeed “fellow citizens” with whom people might easily share a beer or discuss family events. They are not enemies.

I continue to be mystified by the intensity of emotion expressed by the “anti-maskers.” Are they similarly disgruntled over public health laws requiring them to wear shoes when they enter grocery stores? The science behind that rule is probably much less secure than that regarding masks. So where’s the outrage?

And speaking of science, in modern society it all comes down to a matter of trust. After all, few of us can verify their own beliefs with scientific study of their own.

So consider keeping a healthy sense of skepticism about the things you choose to believe. Let some opposing views enter your perspective, and maintain respect for those who believe differently. Sometimes it’s good to remember that we are all on the same team.

Gregory D’Augustine, Greene

Copy the Story Link

« Previous

Anthony Lee Alfreds: Youth incarceration causes trauma cycle

Next »

Gregory Foster: Difference between ‘real racism,’ ‘harmless commentary’