It was heartbreaking to read incarcerated women’s accounts of the sexual harassment and threats they say they’ve endured since Maine began housing biological males who identify as transgender in women’s prison (“Maine women inmates accuse transgender prisoner of harassment,” March 4).
In 2021, when Maine legislators passed the law allowing inmates to be housed by gender identity rather than by sex at birth, I wrote a Sun Journal op-ed (“New prison law endangers women’s safety, privacy“) in which I noted that that the change made no exceptions for violent convicts such as sex offenders or murderers, nor were males required to have sex reassignment surgery before being housed with women. No legislator at the public hearing I viewed expressed concern for female inmates’ safety.
As I wrote then: “Believing that incarcerated males instantly cease to be a threat to women if they identify as women themselves requires an astonishing level of both naivete and disregard for the women caged with them.”
If such inmates are at risk in men’s prison, provide them with a secure unit in the male estate. Why must female inmates (86% of whom report having experienced sexual violence in their lifetime, according to one study) live in fear of sharing their showers or the people they sleep beside?
It’s particularly disheartening that incarcerated women’s cries for help have been met with silence from groups such as Maine Women’s Lobby and ACLU of Maine, both of which supported the 2021 law. Once again, they are prioritizing the rights and safety of another group over the rights and safety of vulnerable women.
Jennifer Gingrich
Co-director, New England Women’s Solidarity
Portland
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less