
FARMINGTON — Voters rejected a Regional School Unit 9 budget for the third time Tuesday. The vote was 1,608 to 2,893.
With the failure of the $32.65 million spending plan, the school board must develop a new proposal to bring to voters in the 10 district towns.
“I am extremely pleased in the overwhelming support from all of our towns,” Superintendent Tom Ward said Tuesday night. “The hard work is not over. Let’s continue to move forward and get a budget.”
The school board will meet at 7 p.m. Thursday, Sept. 14, in the Forum at Mt. Blue Campus to discuss the next step in the process.
A majority of voters cut nearly $1 million at a districtwide budget meeting Sept. 5 after factoring lower debt service from the school board’s proposed $33.67 million budget. The attempt was to fund the budget at last year’s amount, but it ended up being nearly $100,000 less than last year. The majority of the reduction came out of special education services.
In New Sharon, voters passed the budget, 227-210. New Vineyard voters also approved it, 99-78.
Vienna voters rejected the proposal, 41-124, as did Temple voters, 58-123. In Starks the vote was 24-156.
Farmington voters opposed the budget, 565 to 1,243, while Chesterville narrowly passed it, 168-166.
Wilton voters also opposed the budget, 322-575, as did Weld, 44-79.
Industry voters also rejected the budget, 60-139.
If voters had approved the budget, the district was looking at eliminating more than 30 positions and student programs, Ward confirmed Tuesday.
Voters on both sides of the issue and students worked to get voters to the polls.
Comments are not available on this story. Read more about why we allow commenting on some stories and not on others.
We believe it's important to offer commenting on certain stories as a benefit to our readers. At its best, our comments sections can be a productive platform for readers to engage with our journalism, offer thoughts on coverage and issues, and drive conversation in a respectful, solutions-based way. It's a form of open discourse that can be useful to our community, public officials, journalists and others.
We do not enable comments on everything — exceptions include most crime stories, and coverage involving personal tragedy or sensitive issues that invite personal attacks instead of thoughtful discussion.
You can read more here about our commenting policy and terms of use. More information is also found on our FAQs.
Show less