We are writing in opposition to LD 49, “Resolve to Deny Family Status to Fetuses,” which will come before the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee soon.

What possible purpose does this bill have, other than to deny humane financial assistance to citizens with the highest level of need? And at what ultimate cost?

Maternal and fetal health, as well as nutrition, would undoubtedly suffer, producing even higher costs to taxpayers because of increased risks and possible mortality for the baby (fetus).

We believe that more women would be pressured to seek abortion, which would ultimately result in their requiring medical and psychiatric care later – this has been documented. Those would be related costs taxpayers would have to bear.

We must also consider the low birth rate of non-immigrant American women. Europe is already faced with a grave demographic crisis for a similiar reason. Is it not in society’s interest to support prospective mothers in anticipation of working, contributing citizens who will help keep Social Security funds healthy?

Furthermore, if fetuses are to be denied family status, why stop there? Why not newborns, the aged, demented invalids, the seriously disabled, etc.?

The reason we don’t deny such individuals assistance is because we are a humane and civilized people who still recognize our obligation to help our needy sisters and brothers.

Paul Corrao and Mary Roy, Lewiston