I agree with Jean Domaingue’s letter (Jan. 27) … somewhat. I, too, remember John F. Kennedy nostalgically, even fondly. But I also remember another thing: the irresistible charm of the man. His special advisor, John Roche, said “He could charm the birds out of the trees.”
Now charm, in its place, can be a good thing. But it can be exploited, especially in politics, because it is akin to flattery – the worst sin, according to Thomas Aquinas – in its potential insincerity and power to seduce (dare I say, especially women?). Jackie Kennedy said JFK had “magic,” and that, too, is akin to charm, flattery and sorcery. His enormous sexual appetite is a matter of historical record, and that characteristic is dangerous in a politician. I sometimes wonder if Clinton’s sexual misconduct was not ultimately related to JFK’s inordinate influence on him.
Henry Kissinger said, “Power is the greatest aphrodisiac.” That could be especially problematic when combined with charm.
Haven’t the years taught us to focus less on these personal qualities, and more on substance, conduct, virtue and the processes of history itself?
Many leaders in history have exhibited great charm, and not all have done the best by way of peace, justice, or democracy.
We can never be too vigilant about that, even with the current administration.
Paul Corrao, Lewiston
Comments are no longer available on this story