BC-US–Guantanamo Detainees,4th Ld-Writethru/983
Eds: UPDATES with
McConnell quotes; RAISES reference to congressional funding.
AP sources:
Obama eyeing order for Gitmo detainees
Associated Press

WASHINGTON (AP) — Stymied by Congress so far, the White House is considering
issuing an executive order to indefinitely imprison a small number of Guantanamo
Bay detainees considered too dangerous to prosecute or release, two
administration officials said Friday.

No final decisions have been made about the order, which would be the fourth
major mandate by President Barack Obama to deal with how the United States
treats and prosecutes terror suspects and foreign fighters.

One of the officials said the order, if issued, would not take effect until
after the Oct. 1 start of the upcoming 2010 fiscal year. Already, Congress has
blocked the administration from spending any money this year to imprison the
detainees in the United States — which in turn could slow or even halt Obama’s
pledge to close the Navy prison in Cuba by Jan. 21.

The administration also is considering asking Congress to pass new laws that
would allow the indefinite detentions, the official said.

Both of the officials spoke Friday on condition of anonymity because they
were not authorized to discuss the still-tentative issue publicly. The
possibility of an executive order was first reported by ProPublica and The
Washington Post.

“A number of options are being considered,” said one of the officials.

Asked if the detainees would be indefinitely held overseas or in the United
States, the official said: “There’s not really a lot of options overseas.”

Christopher Anders, senior legislative counsel for the American Civil
Liberties Union Washington office, says the organization strongly opposes any
plans for indefinite detention of prisoners.

“We’re saying it shouldn’t be done at all,” he said Friday.

Without legislative backing, an executive order is the only route Obama has
to get the needed authority.

In a statement Friday night, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell cast
doubt that Congress would approve funding for transferring or imprisoning
detainees in the U.S. without detailed plans on how it would work.

Lawmakers this month blocked $80 million the Obama administration had
requested for transferring the detainees. Without the money, Obama’s order can’t
be carried out.

“Bipartisan majorities of Congress and the American people oppose closing
Guantanamo without a plan, and several important questions remain unanswered,”
McConnell said. He said Obama demanded the transfers “before the administration
even has a place to put the detainees who are housed there, any plan for
military commissions, or any articulated plan for indefinite detention.”

McConnell added: “The defense budget request for fiscal year 2010 includes a
similar funding request, so the Senate will consider this matter again in the
near future.”

Obama’s order also would only apply to current detainees at Guantanamo — and
not ones caught and held in future counterinsurgent battles.

There are 229 detainees currently being held at Guantanamo. So far, 11 are
expected to be tried in military tribunals, and at least one — Ahmed Ghailani, a
Tanzanian accused in two American embassy bombings a decade ago — has been
transferred to United States for prosecution by a civilian federal courts in

Still others, including four Chinese Muslims known as Uighurs who were
transferred to Bermuda earlier this month, have been sent to foreign nations.
The Obama administration is trying to relocate as many as 100 Yemeni detainees
to Saudi Arabia for rehabilitation.

Obama said last month he was looking at continued imprisonment for a small
number of Guantanamo detainees whom he described as too dangerous to release. He
called it “the toughest issue we will face.”

“I am not going to release individuals who endanger the American people,”
Obama said during a May 21 speech at the National Archives. “Al-Qaida terrorists
and their affiliates are at war with the United States, and those that we
capture — like other prisoners of war — must be prevented from attacking us

It’s not clear how many detainees could fall into that category. Defense and
Justice Department officials have privately said at least some could be freed at
trial because prosecutors would be reluctant to expose classified evidence
against the detainees. Some of that evidence also might be thrown out because of
how it was obtained — potentially by cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.

A Pentagon task force is currently reviewing every case to see which are
eligible for transfer or release; which could face trial in civilian U.S.
courts; which are best suited to some version of a military commission; and
which are believed too dangerous to free.

Underscoring the difficulty of where to send the detainees before Guantanamo
closes, a senior Defense official said some detainees who were picked up as
enemy combatants cannot be charged with war crimes or terrorism even though they
are believed to pose a threat. If no country volunteers to take them,
traditional law of war authority allows the United States government to hold
them till the end of hostilities, said the official, who also spoke on condition
of anonymity.

Civil rights advocates and constitutional scholars accused Obama of parroting
the detention policies they used to lambaste former Republican President George
W. Bush.

“Prolonged imprisonment without trial is exactly the Guantanamo system that
the president promised to shut down,” Shayana Kadidal, a senior attorney for the
Center for Constitutional Rights, said in a statement Friday.

She added: “If the last eight years have taught us anything, it’s that
executive overreach, left to continue unchecked for many years, has a tendency
to harden into precedent.”

Comments are no longer available on this story